Should the Maple Road gates be left open?

Bromley council are asking for local opinion on the proposal to permanently open theMaple Roadgates unless there is a market operating.   They did start work on opening the gates last month but following local protests are now seeking a wide range of opinions before going ahead.  The gates are closed between 7.00 am and 6.30 pm.   They were installed to protect the market area when it operated on several days a week but their original purpose has clearly gone.   

Should the gates in Maple Road remain closed?

The argument for opening the gates is that Maple Road fulfils a very similar function to Oakfield Road in providing a link between Anerley and Penge. Both Oakfield and Maple roads suffer from some speeding motorists and both have a primary school that exits straight on to the road.   Residents in Oakfield Road and on roads leading off Maple Road have complained to us about the dangerous congestion on Oakfield Road, which was partly relieved while the gates were open.   They want to see the traffic burden shared more equally.  

Residents in Maple Road argue that increased traffic will make that stretch of road less safe as the Maple Road traffic scheme doesn’t reach the market area.  There is also a possibility that motorists in Croydon Roadw ill start using Franklin Road-Maple Road as a rat run to avoid the congestion at the High Street traffic lights.  

Residents in the market area have asked that if the gates are removed. There should be better traffic calming measures.   We support the view that the local safety measures to enforce the 20 mph zone are not effective enough.   We have already told officers that if the gates are left open, either a proper chicane – as at the top of Maple Road– or a raised platform should be installed at the site of the gates.   However, the majority group on the council has a policy of avoiding physical barriers to enforce traffic speeds and no vertical deflection.   That is something we will continue to challenge.   Council officers have told us they believe that speed advisor signs will be adequate for the situation. 

It would be helpful to have a wider range of views.  Please let us know what you think. The council is asking for ANY person wishing to object to the proposal to send a statement in writing of their objection and the grounds thereof to the Director of Environment, Civic Centre, Stockwell Close, Bromley, BR1 3UH, quoting reference ADE(TP)/RP/T100/575 not later than 7th September 2011.

Persons objecting to the proposed orders should be aware that under the provisions of the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985, any comments received in response to this Notice may be open to public inspection. 

As this is short notice, we will present any late views to the council.

About pengeandcatorcouncillors

This blog is maintained by Cllr Kathy Bance MBE, Cllr Peter Fookes and Cllr Kevin Brooks, the Labour Party councillors for Penge & Cator ward on Bromley Council.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Should the Maple Road gates be left open?

  1. Maple Road is already a rat run. As a cyclist, I think that the gates should be turned into a barrier that only cyclists can get past. The chicane at the Anerley end of Maple Road is dangerous, as motor vehicle drivers race through it, often just about knocking off cyclists, or certainly making experienced cyclists scared. As you cycle the length of Maple Road car drivers already try to race past you and round the chicanes otherwise known as parked cars.

    Leaving this gate open will cause even more traffic to go along Maple Road, and make the conditions even worse. Couple that with Bromley being a biking borough, it will do nothing to encourage more people to cycle. I’m sure that many of the trips that the local people will be making would be faster if they cycled rather than taking the car.

    If the council don’t like speed cushions, why are there make you sick as you go over them double bumps on the London cycle route 22 in Rochester Avenue and Nightingale Lane?

    Anerley resident and cyclist on the Croydon Road.


  2. Chris says:

    If Oakfield Road and lead-offs are suffering congestion then surely Oakfield (and/or some of the connectors) should be gated off too (permeable pedestrians and cycles)? The last thing Penge High Street needs is more motor traffic. We have a strategic road network – motor traffic should be using it, not abusing (what should be) quiet roads where people live.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s